From: Richard Lyman Date: 2005-03-16T07:33:11+09:00 Subject: Re: Codefest Grant - RubyGems cleanup and enhancement On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 04:48:49 +0900, Ryan Davis wrote: > > On Mar 14, 2005, at 9:29 PM, Ryan Davis wrote: > > > On Mar 14, 2005, at 12:23 PM, Ben Giddings wrote: > >> Eric Hodel wrote: > >>> Combining RPA and Gems is probably not going to be done during our > >>> Codefest. > >> Is there any chance you could start this process a little bit? > > no > > Lemme clarify a bit more. > > Everyone STFU about RPA vs Gems. It is completely and 100% OT to this > thread. We were mining for data and you guys introduced pure noise. > > Just for total clarity, here is the original email: > > > Seattle.rb will be hosting a RubyGems cleanup and enhancement codefest! > > > > We would like to solicit your ideas on what you want to see cleaned up > > or enhanced in RubyGems. > > > > For our Codefest we do not plan on making large changes to the way > > RubyGems works. One thing we would like to focus on is making the gem > > command more friendly when you hit ^C, for example. > > > > Combining RPA and Gems is probably not going to be done during our > > Codefest. > > We'd like to show up w/ a prioritized list of things we'd like to do > and maybe even some already failing unit tests so we can be on task > from the very beginning. Instead, we are weeding through a bunch of > dogmatic crap that we didn't ask for and are not much closer to having > said list. I've flagged a couple of email for ideas, but they are a > vast minority thus-far. > > P.S. That goes for writing a whole GUI frontend as well. We are meeting > for ONE WEEKEND. > > I'm confused. _What_ goes for writing a whole GUI frontend? You're going to write a frontend for 'gems'? The _first_ release should be entirely possible in one weekend with a couple of good developers. I'm curious so that I know if I should bother to start thinking about it on my own or not... ... on the other hand... If you're telling me to STFU about discussing the fact that I think a GUI for the whole 'gems' concept would be an enhancement (since you asked for our ideas on possible enhancements), then I'm really confused... I guess I just think that STFU is pretty harsh for a list like 'ruby-talk'... and as a possible point of interest: I personally decided to try and live without RPA since one of the 'developers' had such bad PR. I'd really hate to see 'gems' go the same route. Thanks for contributing! I hope I can contribute too. -Rich