From: Shashank Date <shanko_date@...>
Date: 2005-03-12T01:52:04+09:00
Subject: Re: ODBC OG/ActiveRecords


--- David Heinemeier Hansson <david@loudthinking.com>
wrote:
> Generic ODBC adapters are problematic because the
> databases underneath 
> might use different strategies for stuff like
> auto-incremented columns. 

Correct !

> I know that shashank and a few others were
> looking into that for Active Record at some point.

Yes ... but there were a couple of issues (e.g. SELECT
.. TOP syntax, handling of string constants etc) that
prevented me from backporting my adapter seamlessly
into Active Record. I will gladly share my (old) code
with anybody who is interested. 

-- shanko



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/