From: ES <ruby-ml@...>
Date: 2005-03-09T01:33:13+09:00
Subject: Re: webrick in production use?

Navindra Umanee wrote:
> khaines <khaines@enigo.com> wrote:
> 
>>You _probably_ don't want to use Webrick, then.  I count 8 static images on
>>that page.  If they are served with webrick, too, your time to service a
>>complete page request will increase quite a bit, and you will definitely not
>>be happy when you are slashdotted.
> 
> 
> The static images are not a problem, they can be served by an external
> server like they are now.
> 
> It's just that using WEBrick makes things nice and convenient
> implementation-wise...  I hope it'll work out in practice.

Well, you could try submitting 'dot.kde.org Using Neat Ruby Library As
Its Webserver' to Slashdot :)

> Cheers,
> Navin.

E