From: Bill Guindon <agorilla@...>
Date: 2005-03-07T13:08:40+09:00
Subject: Re: WEBrick for a local application?

On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:54:39 +0900, Eko Budi Setiyo
<contact_us@haltebis.com> wrote:

> Actually, I believe in the single point of entry power.
> I used it in FuseLogic(php) and QLogic (ruby). index.php or index.rb
> will decide which module will be executed base on the user response
> (REQUES_URI).
> One example of the benefit among the others is, lets say I change my
> hosting company and some how the install ruby on difference path. What I
> have to do is just change
> the first line from #!/bin/ruby to #!/user/bin/ruby (this is example
> only!) in the index.rb
> 
> The reason I ask is I already try to use Webrick and doesn't do what I
> want.
> What happen to my scripts is, lets say I already use my browser to hit
> http://127.0.0.1/index.rb/init/version than after that I hit
> http://127.0.0.1/index.rb/bittorrents/main ,
> Webrick will always give the same result as
> http://127.0.0.1/index.rb/init/version
> 
> I really want to use webrick also for my RubyToday project
> 
> May be I am doing some thing wrong here. I don't know

What are you doing in index.rb?  I'd think a simple 'include' would do
it after you parse the URI, but I could be missing something.

-- 
Bill Guindon (aka aGorilla)