From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Date: 2005-03-07T04:50:36+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby-dev summary 25741-25780

Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@ttsky.net> writes:

> Christian Neukirchen wrote:
>> What about  foo { |a| ... } { |b| ... }  ? }:-)
>
> In my opinion, foo{|a|...}{|b|...} had better be semantically equivalent to foo(){|a|...}(){|b|...}
> at this time. What do you think? For example, we can write the following code.
>
> myif = {|&cond|
>    if( cond() )
>      {|&then_block| {|&else_block| then_block()}}
>    else
>      {|&then_block| {|&else_block| else_block()}}
>    end
> }
>
> I hope we are able to invoke the above Proc object as follows.
>
>    myif{ true }{"then"}{"else"}
>    myif(){ true }(){"then"}(){"else"}

Convinces me, although I was thinking of foo(lambda{|a|..}){|b|...}.

> Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@ttsky.net>
-- 
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org