From: Curt Hibbs <curt@...>
Date: 2005-03-04T11:10:59+09:00
Subject: Re: RAA Status & b

Sam Roberts wrote:
>
> Quoting jamesUNDERBARb@neurogami.com, on Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at
> 03:37:54AM +0900:
> > Curt Hibbs wrote:
> > >Below, I posting the entire text of this blog entry:
> > >
> > >  http://sean.typepad.com/ditto/2005/03/the_problem_wit.html
> > >
> > >I think that this guy has really called it right. There have been a few
> > >postings about a reworking of RAA... does anyone know the
> current status of
> > >this effort?
> > >
> > >Curt
> > >
> > >==========================
> > >http://sean.typepad.com/ditto/2005/03/the_problem_wit.html
> > >The Problem with Ruby
>
>
> I don't agree at all. I go first to RAA, then google, I've never
> searched rubyforge.
>
> Why should somebody have to put their package on rubyforge if they have
> a place they'd rather do their development?

There are many projects on RubyForge that do not host their project there.
Ruby on Rails is a good example. It is hosted on its own servers, tracks
bugs and issues on its own servers, but releases RubyGems to RubyForge for
easy download and install.

Curt