From: "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Date: 2005-02-01T20:39:47+09:00
Subject: Re: Behaviors (Re: Should every method have a module method?)

Hi --

On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Pit Capitain wrote:

> David A. Black schrieb:
>> This was one of the first things I worked on when I got interested in
>> Ruby, and the result was the almost-proof-of-concept project Ruby
>> Behaviors, which offered a mechanism for block-scoped changes to the
>> core language.  It wasn't thread-safe, though.  There are some other
>> similar packages that do similar things, one of which I believe is
>> thread-safe.  And Matz has been talking about some kind of namespace
>> facility in Ruby 2.0 to allow for this kind of thing too.
>
> Hallo David,
>
> is your Behaviors package available somewhere? (The link in RAA isn't valid 
> anymore.) Do you have a little bit more information about the other packages 
> you were talking about?

I've fixed the link (thanks for pointing it out).  The other packages
are called class-in-state and import_module (both in RAA).


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net