From: Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
Date: 2005-01-31T05:35:07+09:00
Subject: Re: FYI: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?


On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, James Britt wrote:
> Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> > Purity is only mentioned a bit, but all of the article seems to be
> > attacking mostly Java, with little evidence of any research into other
> > approaches to OOP. For something in a Python newsgroup I'd expect
> > something more enlightened than that.
> But that's the thing; it was apparently posted to comp.lang.*

Woops! I should have noticed that.

> I don't care for certain things about Python, but it seems to attract a 
> number of bright people, and I hope that this particular article doesn't 
> tarnish how people view the Python community.

I hope too.

_____________________________________________________________________
Mathieu Bouchard -=- Montr�al QC Canada -=- http://artengine.ca/matju