From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Date: 2005-01-31T03:28:23+09:00
Subject: Re: nil question

"David A. Black" <dblack@wobblini.net> writes:

>> So false is bigger than 9?  Math books will need to be rewritten. :-)
>
> I assume the expression would short-circuit once one of the
> sub-expressions returned false, since
>
>    x < y < z
>
> cannot be true unless x < y.  So there would never be a false < z
> comparison.

So < would get a special operator.

Please keep my beloved < as it is!
-- 
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org