From: James Britt <jamesUNDERBARb@...>
Date: 2005-01-30T06:09:43+09:00
Subject: Re: FYI: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
 > ...
> Purity is only mentioned a bit, but all of the article seems to be
> attacking mostly Java, with little evidence of any research into other
> approaches to OOP. For something in a Python newsgroup I'd expect
> something more enlightened than that.


But that's the thing; it was apparently posted to comp.lang.*

If this were just Pythonistas discussing things among themselves I too 
would expect far more enlightened observations.

I don't care for certain things about Python, but it seems to attract a 
number of bright people, and I hope that this particular article doesn't 
tarnish how people view the Python community.


James