From: Douglas Livingstone <rampant@...>
Date: 2005-01-30T01:13:33+09:00
Subject: Re: FYI: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?

> Trolling trolls or not, is it not the case that everything in Java has
> to be part of a class one way or another?

From the article:

a = "a string";
b = "another one";
c = join(a,b);
print c;

In Ruby:

a = "a string"
b = "another one"
c = a + b
print c

And everything still gets to be objects :)

Douglas