From: Alexander Kellett Date: 2005-01-27T19:59:16+09:00 Subject: Re: Type Inference On Jan 27, 2005, at 9:50 AM, Robert Klemme wrote: >> No. It has been done in practice, just not for Ruby. >> >> But I would propose actually changing the language to better support >> this sort of thing. > > I opt against this: not every good or useful language feature must be > present in Ruby. i've lost the track of threads now (hope you don't mind if i request that you please use 'was: blah' when changing thread name...) is this for having the benefits of static type checking or for optimisation? Alex