From: Pit Capitain <pit@...>
Date: 2005-01-26T04:35:13+09:00
Subject: Re: top-level object? top-level methods?

Yukihiro Matsumoto schrieb:
>     on Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:07:19 +0900, Pit Capitain <pit@capitain.de> writes:
> 
> |I like this proposal. Would there be any drawbacks?
> 
> 1. Compatibility.  It would break a lot of code, which assume
>    top-level def can be seen from everywhere.
> 
> 2. Mindset.  I feel above assumption is natural.

Oh, now I see. Seems I've never mixed procedural and OO code, so I hadn't 
thought of any use for this "feature". Thanks for the clarification. I should 
have known you chose this implementation for a reason.

Regards,
Pit