From: Pit Capitain <pit@...>
Date: 2005-01-25T23:47:56+09:00
Subject: Re: "Duck Typing" or "No need for abstract classes"

Lothar Scholz schrieb:
> CS> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> CS> Of course, creating something like this is much harder in a language
> CS> like Ruby where objects are ever-changing and ever-malliable
...
> 100% ACK.
> As a toolwriter i often get requests: I want a good working
> refactoring browsers, where are the code tooltips,
> can't you integrate a ruby lint etc.
> 
> These tools all need a type inference engine and this is a huge task.
...

I'm sure you know where the original refactoring browser came from. Your last 
statement is simply wrong.

Regards,
Pit