From: E S <eero.saynatkari@...>
Date: 2005-01-23T08:23:45+09:00
Subject: Re: Documenting ruby.h and intern.h (was rb_const_get documentation)

>E S wrote:
>...

>> In favour of Doxy (or rdoc), the people actually programming might be
>> more inclined to update the docs if they were present right there in
>> the source.
>>
>> In either case, I'm sure www.ruby-doc.org would have the space?

>Yes.

Excellent!

>BTW, has this:

> http://www.ruby-doc.org/doxygen/1.8.1/index.html

>been mentioned here yet?

Yep. The problem is that there's no documentation as to
/what/ the functions do (not to mention Doxygen's normal
cumbersome navigation). One can look at the source but,
witness my recent confusion about command-line arguments
that Nakada-dono clarified, it may not be enough :)

There's the Ruby Hacking Guide[1] that Daigo Moriwaki mentioned
on Redhanded[2]. Anyone read that, is it on this topic?

>James.

E

[1] http://www.amazon.co.jp/exec/obidos/ASIN/4844317210/qid%3D1106059404/250-3696771-8683419
[2] http://redhanded.hobix.com