From: Alexander Kellett Date: 2005-01-19T23:37:02+09:00 Subject: Re: value by reference On Jan 19, 2005, at 3:06 PM, trans. wrote: > Right. I'm not suggesting that Ruby change this. I'm just wondering if > might be possible to add an extra feature that would allow for the > alternate when passing arguments through methods. sorry if this offends, but there is no less blunt way to say it. if anyone need it. they've gone wrong already. the solution: design alex