From: Stefan Scholl <stesch@...>
Date: 2005-01-18T08:11:05+09:00
Subject: Re: PHP ERB

On 2005-01-17 22:42:32, Aredridel wrote:

> +1 in concept, because XML standards suggest it this way, too. However,
> <?ruby is better, following the XML processing-instructions spec.

Why bother? I don't think something like

	<a href="foo/?baz=<?ruby print xyz.poo(42) ?>">

is valid XML either.