From: "trans.  (T. Onoma)" <transami@...>
Date: 2005-01-18T02:28:27+09:00
Subject: Re: Fwd: [suby-ruby] Your all time desired fundamental Ruby mod

On Monday 17 January 2005 12:11 pm, David A. Black wrote:
|
| I think we have to agree on a parting of the ways on this at this
| point :-)

Okay. But that's too bad I think. I'd really like to get more to the bottom of 
this.

I do find it strange that you seem not think it is impolite that a module or 
superclass should be able to define an instance var. Is this because a 
subclass should have the right to not allow that instance var to be defined? 
If that's the case then maybe that's right. I'm not sure if its a real 
problem. On the other hand modules aren't superclasses, as mixins, I think 
modules need that right (IMHO).

Thanks for the discussion,
T.