From: gabriele renzi <rff_rff@...>
Date: 2005-01-14T23:46:13+09:00
Subject: Re: Duck Typing and automated Conversions

Robert Klemme ha scritto:

> Although the two suggestions are clearly related and can be combined,
> they're completely orthogonal IMHO.  You can always have one without the
> other.  Personally I'm not sure whether I like the idea of a type
> conversion framework like that of RCR 280 [..]

Yes, I did not intend to say they implicate each other in some way, It 
just came to my mind when I saw "any method could be invoked like this, 
maybe even with parameters[..]".