From: Charles Mills <cmills@...>
Date: 2005-01-13T04:51:16+09:00
Subject: Re: optparse

Eric Hodel wrote:
> On 12 Jan 2005, at 07:36, Charles Mills wrote:
>
> > Also noticed their is a preformance price for using optparse.
> > Switching to optparse from getoptlong slowed down the main
benchmark we
> > run from ~3.5sec to about ~4.5sec.  Isn't that big of a deal I
guess,
> > but food for thought.
>
> What kind of hardware are you running, and how many options do you
> have?  I can't imagine how many options you have that adds an extra
> second to runtime.

12 options.  Running a 1ghz powerbook.

Any idea about the first question?  Seems like you can only do "--word
arg" or "-c arg", not "-word arg".

-Charlie