From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2005-01-11T10:03:48+09:00
Subject: Re: A question on Ruby license

Hi,

In message "Re: A question on Ruby license"
    on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 07:46:52 +0900, Douglas Livingstone <rampant@gmail.com> writes:
|
|> well:
|>    3. You may distribute the software in object code or executable
|>       form, provided that you do at least ONE of the following:
|>         [...]
|>         c) give non-standard executables non-standard names, with
|>            instructions on where to get the original software distribution.
|
|So not "Ruby 1.8.99" (just to make it clear :)

If you really want to name it "Ruby 1.8.99", discard the Ruby terms,
and apply GPL only.  I don't want it though.

							matz.
p.s.
It's OK to fork, or create a new language based on Ruby source code.