From: eero.saynatkari@... Date: 2004-12-24T04:59:49+09:00 Subject: Re: OT: vi useability question > L�hett�j�: Hans Fugal > I type about 67 wpm (qwerty) and I have no doubt that the reason I don't > type faster is that the process is brain-bound. If I were doing > secretarial work it would be another story. I can type "instantaneous" > compared to the brainwork of the coding/sysadminning that I do. > > I'm a pianist and organist, and my fingers are accustomed to rapid > movement. That is why I believe it is the lack of need that keeps me > from typing faster. You should probably do a diagnostic if your I/O routines are faster than your CPU :) Anecdotally, Dvorak has been great. I've no doubt that one can write fast either on QWERTY or Dvorak; to me the main advantage is the reduced stress on my hands. I learned Dvorak by printing out a key layout and placing it between my keyboard and monitor (learned to touch-type at the same time). The first week was pretty painful but I regained (and subsequently surpassed) my earlier speed in about two weeks. The important bit is to not skip between Dvorak and QWERTY while learning (so it might be a good idea to start on your vacation instead of in the middle of a Big Project:) .