From: Ferenc Engard <ferenc@...>
Date: 2004-12-20T08:17:59+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby/SDL question

gltewalt@yahoo.com wrote:
> 
> Logan Capaldo wrote:
> > Another option is RUDL which like Ruby/SDL is an SDL binding for
> ruby.
> >
> > http://rudl.sourceforge.net/
> 
> Except RUDl factors out more low level tinkering than ruby/sdl.
> It has built in methods to help deal with collision detection, etc.
> RUDL is essentially pyGame for Ruby, cleaned up abit to do away with
> what the author disliked about pyGame

I plan for a strategy (board) game, I choosed SDL because of its
popularity (it is not bad to learn it), and because it is
multi-platform. I currently use it only for sound playing.

Meanwhile I could decompress the package with the debian-package lha.
But, if the package maintainer reads this, there are plenty of great and
free compressed formats, why did you chose an obscure one (even in lzh
with an obscure method, which do not recognize many lzh depackers) where
it is a separate project for the user to find a depacker utility? :-O

Thank you for the answers.

Ferenc