From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2004-12-15T09:05:29+09:00
Subject: Re: Array#at(selector,...)

Hi,

In message "Re: Array#at(selector,...)"
    on Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:17:25 +0900, "trans.  (T. Onoma)" <transami@runbox.com> writes:

|Is there good reason to have two different methods for this?
|
|  array.at(index)
|  array.values_at(selector,... )

Return value, the latter returns an array of specified values.

|And then
|
|  array.delete_at(index)
|
|Can't this take selector instead?

The change would cause incompatibility in return values.

							matz.