From: Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Date: 2004-12-15T08:47:59+09:00
Subject: Re: no-argument sort()

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> In message "Re: no-argument sort()"
>     on Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:12:17 +0900, Alex Fenton <alex@deleteme.pressure.to> writes:
> 
> |> It bypasses #<=> for objects of class String and subclasses
> |
> |Is that considered a bug, a feature or a performance compromise?
> 
> Performance compromise.

Can we document this in enum.c and/or array.c, where this applies? Any 
volonteers? ;-)

Regards,

   Michael