From: Jim Weirich Date: 2004-12-12T12:11:49+09:00 Subject: Re: puts / print as method not keyword? On Saturday 11 December 2004 05:56 pm, zuzu wrote: > On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 17:20:46 -0500, zuzu wrote: > > here is how jim was thinking of it. he seems to love mixing in > > Enumerable for all kinds of fun dataflow tricks, and that seemed not > > such a bad idea to me. > > > > but don't let this stifle your creativity thinking about postfix / > > concatenative combinators this time around. (the terminology of > > "concatenative combinators" first found me by way of the Forth > > language, which then influenced the Toy language. feel free to also > > browse jim cunningham's excellent programming language wiki at > > c2.com). > > er, ward cunningham. got jim on the brain. :p sorry ward. Dang, this doesn't even lower my Ward Number (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WardNumber). > > From: Jim Weirich > > Reply-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org > > To: ruby-talk ML > > Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:07:09 +0900 > > Subject: Re: python generators to ruby closures, help -- -- Jim Weirich jim@weirichhouse.org http://onestepback.org ----------------------------------------------------------------- "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it." -- Donald Knuth (in a memo to Peter van Emde Boas)