From: Peter <Peter.Vanbroekhoven@...>
Date: 2004-12-06T17:44:03+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] patch to "make def return something useful"

> A Method still isn't good, because you can't easily get the name of
> the Method without calling #inspect.

You're right, the Ruby programmer can't get at the name of the method not 
the class it is defined in. Inside the Ruby core it is of course very 
easy. There are no (Unbound)?Method#(name|class), probably because there 
was no use for them, but is there another reason against adding these 
methods?

Peter