From: djberg96@... (Daniel Berger)
Date: 2004-12-01T23:12:45+09:00
Subject: Re: [OFF] Python 2.4 released

Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@scriptolutions.com> wrote in message news:<15310843609.20041201115112@scriptolutions.com>...
> Hello gabriele,
> 
> gr> this does not relate to the object model.
> gr> A common python idiom is always been:
> gr> class Foo(object):
> gr>   def foo():
> gr>    ...
> gr>   foo=somedecorator(foo)
> 
> gr> wich is basically what we do in ruby with:
> gr> class Foo
> gr>   def foo
> gr>    ...
> gr>   end
> gr>   somedecorator :foo
> gr> end
> 
> gr> Btw, I hope matz will accept RCR 277 soon
> gr> http://rcrchive.net/rcr/show/277
> 
> 
> Again you get a "no" from me about RCR 277.
> 
> I can't see any real value of your notation, it just makes the use of
> public even more unclear. I would instead vote for not even allow
> "public" to be state sensitiv.

How does it make it more unclear?  How is it unclear in the first
place?  Curious statement.

Dan