From: ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)
Date: 2004-12-01T10:37:47+09:00
Subject: Re: Optional static typing (or, What can Ruby 2.0 borrow from Boo?)

In article <20041201003620.GD9390@puritan.pcp.ath.cx>,
Nikolai Weibull  <mailing-lists.ruby-talk@rawuncut.elitemail.org> wrote:
>* Phil Tomson <ptkwt@aracnet.com> [Dec 01, 2004 01:10]:
>> [Often red gemstones are used to represent Ruby, but perhaps we should
>> consider a duck of some sort.  Maybe even an ascii-art one we can drag
>> out for these occasions.]
>
>(This was actually proposed a while ago, but we have been unable to find
>a good picture without a copyright.)

Why not have Why_the_lucky_stiff draw us one?  The guy's got talent.



Phil