From: Eivind Eklund <eeklund@...>
Date: 2004-11-23T00:28:56+09:00
Subject: Re: RPA vs rubygems (Re: [ANN] postgres-pr (pure Ruby PostgreSQL))

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:35:35 +0900, Abraham Vionas
<abe_ml@bozemantechmedic.com> wrote:
> OH NO, you realize you're opening the proverbial can of worms, right? Last
> time (if I recall correctly) things ended up with Gems vs. RPA'ers and at
> each others throats.

I think a new recall is in order :-)  RPA and the Gems crew has a
fairly good relationship; especially after RubyGems committed to
fixing the main thing that has been seriously bothering the RPA team:
That RubyGems is hard to repackage, and this has been gnawing on our
relationship.  With the RubyGems commitment, we're all much more
relaxed, and the RPA/RubyGems relationship is quite good :-)

Eivind.
-- 
Hazzle free packages for Ruby?
RPA is available from http://www.rubyarchive.org/