From: George Ogata <g_ogata@...>
Date: 2004-11-15T23:33:20+09:00
Subject: Re: Kernel#singleton_class

"trans.  (T. Onoma)" <transami@runbox.com> writes:

> On Monday 15 November 2004 08:45 am, David A. Black wrote:
> |
> | Yeah, as long as he doesn't choose 'virtual' :-)
>
> He he. Seems like all the readily floated possibilities have poor 
> connotations. I've heard complaints about all three: 'virtual', 'meta', and 
> of course, 'singleton'. So what do others think of 'instance' class? Or more 
> to the point 'special' class -- a specialton ;)

Personal class?  (Every object has its own personal class.)