From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2004-11-14T18:43:32+09:00
Subject: Re: [DOCBUG] Proc#arity

Hi,

In message "Re: [DOCBUG] Proc#arity"
    on Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:19:25 +0900, Mauricio Fern�ndez <batsman.geo@yahoo.com> writes:

|> An inconsistency in the docs for Proc#arity ? Here's what ri says:
|> 
|>      arguments. A +proc+ with no argument declarations returns -1, as it
|>      can accept (and ignore) an arbitrary number of parameters.

|        * eval.c (proc_arity): arity is now defined as number of
|          parameters that would not be ignored. i.e. Proc.new{}.arity
|          returns zero.  update test suites too.

And lambda{}.call(1) should have made to raise exception.  I will fix
this.  Could somebody update the document?

							matz.