From: Florian Gross <flgr@...>
Date: 2004-11-14T03:23:24+09:00
Subject: Re: Simple question concerning overloading

itsme213 wrote:

> Which brings me back to a question I've asked before. In 2.0 with keyword
> arguments will
> 
> delete (obj)
> and
> delete(at: index)
> 
> be distinguishable methods? If not, I think we will not get the full benefit
> of keyword arguments. I'd be forced to use delete_at where I would prefer to
> use delete:at:

They will be from inside the method, I suppose. We can build real method 
overloading around that easily.