From: "trans.  (T. Onoma)" <transami@...>
Date: 2004-11-13T21:37:15+09:00
Subject: Re: FastCGI parameters (get and post)

On Saturday 13 November 2004 01:00 am, Aredridel wrote:
| On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:53:11 +0900, Zev Blut <rubyzbibd@ubit.com> wrote:
| > On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 04:13:08 +0900, Aredridel <aredridel@gmail.com> wrote:
| > > Give XTemplate a spin -- with a little work to emulate hashes in your
| > > objects, you can use arbitrary objects as data, as in Amrita, and it
| > > works nicely and fast
| >
| > XTemplate seems pretty close to Amrita, but I really do not want to
| > have to make my objects emulate hashes.  If I have to put that much
| > work into preparing my output, then I might as well stick the data I
| > want into hashes in the first place...  Although, thanks for reminding
| > me of XTemplate!  When I get the time I will try to look into it a bit
| > more.  How much faster is it than Amrita?
|
| A fair bit, since it can use an XML parser. Not an order of magnitude,
| but noticeably. Depends on what you do, of course.

I've often heard Amrita is great but slow. I wonder if anyone is up to 
translating the slow bits to c ?

T.