From: Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@...>
Date: 2004-11-13T11:23:20+09:00
Subject: Re: win32ole and ole_methods

Hello,

In message "Re: win32ole and ole_methods"
    on 04/11/12, gabriele renzi <rff_rff@remove-yahoo.it> writes:

> > That seems a little overkill, why not just some_array.sort { |a, b|
> > a.name <=> b.name }
> > 
> 
> well, but why should'nt it have a reasomnable default for the sort 
> routine? I'm for defining <=>, for what my opinion counts

If I can define the reasonable "<=>" method and it should have
the "<=>" method, then I am going to implement it.
So, I have a question.

Which is the reasonable WIN32OLE_METHOD#<=>,
  method1.name <=> method2.name 
    or 
  method1.dispid <=> method2.dispid?

Is the former reasonable?

  Regards,
  Masaki Suketa