From: "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Date: 2004-11-12T10:13:32+09:00
Subject: Re: non-nil, etc.  (was Re: true? & false?)

Hi --

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Hal Fulton wrote:

> Joel VanderWerf wrote:
> > 
> > Why not just define #empty? for Fixum, File, NilClass, and Object, and 
> > then define nonempty? instead of (argh, can't... make... self... type... 
> > this...) nnull? ?
> 
> Yes, nnull? is a pretty ugly name, isn't it? But I dislike long names
> such as non_null, not_null, non_empty, aint_null, etc.

How about ull?  :-)


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net