From: Michael Granger <ged@...>
Date: 2004-11-12T02:39:46+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] RedCloth 3.0.0 -- Textile and Markdown Elope!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Nov 9, 2004, at 10:03 AM, gabriele renzi wrote:

> Tobias Luetke ha scritto:
>
>>> I can think of one reason: BlueCloth is GPL'd, and RedCloth isn't. If
>>> licensing is an issue, this gives you more Ruby-based solutions to
>>> choose from.
>>>
>> I just found out that my commercial ruby application ought to be GPL
>> because i used bluecloth.
>> I'll switch to RedCloths markdown in record time =)
>
> maybe you could ask the authors to change the license..

Since the library that I derived Bluecloth from (Markdown.pl) is GPL, I 
don't have that liberty, unfortunately. I wouldn't have chosen the GPL 
if it weren't for that.

- --
Michael Granger <ged@FaerieMUD.org>
Rubymage, Architect, Believer
The FaerieMUD Consortium <http://www.FaerieMUD.org/>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFBk6O/+zlz4UKpE6QRAjIxAKDyC0mIzIFqURAn/7GcU9rAw/dbZgCg8DVs
fQJmObXdCzEJhwnHrqehLhU=
=qyte
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----