From: Ryan Davis Date: 2004-11-11T17:41:58+09:00 Subject: Re: [ANN] ParseTree 1.0.0 Released On Nov 10, 2004, at 6:11 PM, Lothar Scholz wrote: > But shouldn't they available now you have outsourced the code to this > project. When i read "parsetree" together with a 1.0 version i would > expect that it gives me a complete reverseable tree representation. I'm sorry we didn't meet your expectations of quality on a dot-oh release. Please remember that this is an open-source _free_ software release. We welcome _constructive_ criticism as well as patches. > And another question, shouldn't "super" (which is among the omitted > nodes) count as 1 in the abc metrics ? Yes, it probably should. I'll make that change now.