From: Brian Wisti <brianwisti@...>
Date: 2004-11-11T11:25:53+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] ParseTree 1.0.0 Released

After looking at the various software packages out there including open
source and closed, public domain and commercial), I've come to the
conclusion that version numbering is pretty much arbitrary. I think
when a Zen* package comes out, they mark it as "1.0" because it is now
good enough to do what they'd intended it to, and it has been released
so the rest of us can take a look.

Kind Regards,

Brian Wisti
http://coolnamehere.com/

--- Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@scriptolutions.com> wrote:

> But shouldn't they available now you have outsourced the code to this
> project. When i read "parsetree" together with a  1.0 version i would
> expect that it gives me a complete reverseable tree representation.
> 
> And another question, shouldn't  "super" (which is among the omitted
> nodes) count as 1 in the abc metrics ?
> 
> 
> -- 
>  Best regards,                        emailto: scholz at
> scriptolutions dot com
>  Lothar Scholz                        http://www.ruby-ide.com
>  CTO Scriptolutions                   Ruby, PHP, Python IDE 's
>  
> 
> 
>