From: Logan Capaldo <logancapaldo@...>
Date: 2004-11-09T12:11:29+09:00
Subject: Re: rdoc and vim folding

set foldlevel (I use foldlevel=2). As for markers, don't use them, use
syntax based folding. I dunno where I found the file (as it was real
difficult to find) but if anyone wants the custom RubyVim files with
support for syntax based folding and matchit support (% for def, end,
etc.) let me know, I can email them to you.


On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 10:14:45 +0900, Gavin Sinclair
<gsinclair@soyabean.com.au> wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 9, 2004, 11:43:33 AM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Hans Fugal wrote:
> 
> >> I haven't had cause to use markers to do folding in ruby much, but I do use
> >> the feature. I can't remember at the moment whether foldmethod=syntax or
> >> foldmethod=indent works well for ruby code.
> 
> > IMHO - neither.  too many folds.  i like to fold class bodies, module bodies,
> > and function bodies - and that's all.  either way above does a LOT more.
> 
> Isn't there a way to limit the number of folds created by
> fm=indent?
> 
> I would like to use Vim's folding, but there doesn't seem to be a way
> to have it just Do The Right Thing.  I certainly don't want explicit
> fold markers in the code.
> 
> Cheers,
> Gavin
> 
>