From: Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Date: 2004-11-08T23:11:27+09:00
Subject: Re: [RDOC] Documenting accessor methods as methods

On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 10:50:18PM +0900, Jim Weirich wrote:
> 
> Dave Thomas said:
> >
> > On Nov 7, 2004, at 23:00, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
> >> But there's one problem as I see it at the moment: attributes don't
> >> appear in the method pane.  This sometimes incurs difficulties: try to
> >> find a method (you don't know what class) in a large body of
> >> documentation, only to discover it's an attribute.
> >
> > Do you mean the list at the top? That's a good point. I could probably
> > work them in there. Should they be intermingled, or listed separately?
> 
> Intermingled ... on the theory that if you are looking up a method in the
> list, you would like to check one place rather than many.

Hm, and how about methods inherited from a superclass? Shouldn't they be
shown there either? Or at least in a section called "methods inherited
by superclass".

Regards,

  Michael