From: itsme213 <itsme213@...>
Date: 2004-11-02T00:18:50+09:00
Subject: Re: New Ruby conditional semantics thoughts


"Robert Klemme" <bob.news@gmx.net> wrote
> This one just stroke me: if syntax could be further relaxed without
> introducing ambiguities then maybe we'd be able to write something like
this
> without other means:
>
> expr.ifDo { puts "true" } :elseDo { puts "nah" }

See http://rcrchive.net/rcr/show/229