From: Chad Fowler <chadfowler@...>
Date: 2004-10-31T07:32:52+09:00
Subject: Re: Flea vs RubyGarden

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 02:23:54 +0900, Phlip <phlip_cpp@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Rubistas:
> 
> I sympathize with the battle on spam, but I was using RubyGarden to build
> the "home sites" for MRW and Flea. Both require pages with transcluded
> graphics, to avoid the need for thousands of boring words.
> 
> RubyGarden stopped building the <img> tag around graphic file links.
> 
> I'm too lazy to build my own static Web site for these pictures. Was images
> in spam a big problem? or did some script just clobber my graphics by
> accident?

Flipster,

The image links just need to be changed to upper-case the protocol
part of the URL (e.g. HTTP://www.blah.com/someimage.jpg).

Hopefully not too much of a pain.

Thanks,
Chad Fowler

http://chadfowler.com
http://rubycentral.org 
http://rubygarden.org 
http://rubygems.rubyforge.org (over 20,000 gems served!)