From: Eivind Eklund <eeklund@...>
Date: 2004-10-28T21:09:33+09:00
Subject: Re: Gems as key? Re: The real Ruby vs. Python.

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:38:11 +0900, trans.  (T. Onoma)
<transami@runbox.com> wrote:
> Then it sounds like that RubyGems needs to adopt the framework of RPA, and
> help improve/adapt it to its needs, e.g. versionsing.
> 
> I like RPA. I want to use RPA. But I can't. I have to say "pretty please"
> package this for me. I understand the QA. I think that's great. But I also
> think there needs be a way for beta wares to "get on the line". Gems allows
> that. So I'll just use Gems.

Would it help you if we added the ability to "fall back to" gems for
the cases where something hasn't been RPAfied to the user interface?

Eivind.
-- 
Hazzle free packages for Ruby?
RPA is available from http://www.rubyarchive.org/