From: Abe Vionas_MailingList Date: 2004-10-28T00:57:21+09:00 Subject: Re: The real Ruby vs. Python. On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:18:31 +0900, Alexander Kellett wrote: >�On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 12:07:10AM +0900, trans. �(T. Onoma) wrote: > >>�Are there downsides to this approach for Windows users? >> >�cygwin is huge has an awful interface and >�has severe problems with having multiple >�cygwin1.dll's on the same system. > >�native compiles are by far my preference. >�windows far from a single platform is *FAR* >�more fragmented that linux will ever be. > >�how many ruby windows sub-platforms exist >�now in total? �four or is it five now? how >�can anyone be expected to help when all of >�them suck in there own little way? (e.g, >�1-click doesn't have a standard package >�thats in base ruby - curses) > >�Alex (who can't wait any longer to get his ibook and remove both >�windows *and* linux at long last) I agree with you on Cygwin. I used it once and that's all it took. Like cod liver oil the taste is still with me, and it's not pleasant. Yuck. I'm curious what you mean by sub-platforms? It seems to me that it is in fact the Linux/Unix world that has 8-billion different platforms/packages/releases or whatever. Windows does indeed have releases, but at least they come from one place. If you support windows 2000 you're basically supporting Windows 2000, NT, and XP... and that's your primary code base. For those that are still using 98....uh, well, they need to get a new computer. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail