From: "trans.  (T. Onoma)" <transami@...>
Date: 2004-10-20T00:31:19+09:00
Subject: Re: documentation as source

On Tuesday 19 October 2004 10:51 am, Eivind Eklund wrote:
| I'm not - these are labelled as "examples", and should IMO primarily
| be viewed as examples.  Examples that happen to be tested, and that
| happen to include some of the test coverage for the program, but
| *primarily* examples, and a part of documentation.

That's a good point.

T.