From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2004-10-16T03:44:14+09:00
Subject: Re: "nan".to_f ?

Hi,

In message "Re: "nan".to_f ?"
    on Sat, 16 Oct 2004 03:39:51 +0900, GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@notwork.org> writes:

|>      My mistake is clear.  I was assuming Float == IEEE.
|
|Mistake? I don't think you mistook. or I also mistake. 
|When we are talking about Ruby, NaN means IEEE 754's NaN, isn't it?  :)

C99 defines isnan() and isinf().  I'm not sure C99 assumes IEEE 754.

							matz.