From: Mikael Brockman Date: 2004-10-13T01:22:07+09:00 Subject: Re: "nan".to_f ? Markus writes: > Yes, but his point is that "NaN" _is_ the string representation of > valid floating point value, defined and handled by the system, with > standardized semantics, etc. > "NaN".to_f should return NaN. How else are you going to reliably > get NaN if you need it? 0.0/0.0? :-)