From: Jamis Buck <jgb3@...>
Date: 2004-10-11T21:24:50+09:00
Subject: Re: DI service change notifications (Syringe)

leon breedt wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:12:47 +0900, Jamis Buck <jgb3@email.byu.edu> wrote:
> 
>>Now, if that is what you were wanting, the above COULD be implemented as
>>a new service model:
> 
> Sounds workable, easier to understand as well. I don't mind having to
> explicitly declare the dependencies, easier to maintain as well, no
> undercover magic :)
> 
> The behaviour I'd want is probably just for #refresh! to cause a
> #refresh! call on all the observers, but thats just implementation
> details.

I actually thought of that detail after I posted the email, so I 
agree--that is a feature that ought to exist in the service model as well.

> 
> Thanks for the detailed responses!

No problem! I just hope they weren't _too_ detailed. I felt like I was 
rambling a bit too much... At any rate, I'm glad they were helpful.

- Jamis

-- 
Jamis Buck
jgb3@email.byu.edu
http://www.jamisbuck.org/jamis