From: "trans.  (T. Onoma)" <transami@...>
Date: 2004-10-10T02:30:51+09:00
Subject: Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics)

On Saturday 09 October 2004 01:14 pm, James Edward Gray II wrote:
| On Oct 9, 2004, at 7:07 AM, Brian Candler wrote:
| > I agree with Matz - Range#member? is not very useful. For the
| > occasional
| > case where you might need such semantics, it's easy enough to code up
| > your
| > own object which behaves how you want.
|
| Or just use:
|
| (3..5).to_a.include?(4)

Note that this won't work for 

  Inf = 1.0/0
  (3..Inf).to_a.include?(5)

T.